Elaine
Gunn, CF Registry Clinical Data Manager, presents her
highlights of day 2 at the NACFC
Day
two was the first full day of meetings at conference. There were several
parallel workshops during the morning and I chose to attend W2 - Emerging
approaches to CF therapy. The highlights of this workshop, and most relevant to
me in terms of the Registry, were:
a)
The presentation about predicting response to inhaled Mannitol treatment in CF
patients. After the worldwide trials of Mannitol, of which we in the UK were heavily
involved, the data was assessed to see whether an early response to the drug
could be maintained. The data showed that if someone responded well in terms of
improved FEV1 and reduction in exacerbations at six weeks then this
response would be maintained at six months. Likewise if the patient did not
respond at six weeks to Mannitol then there would be no response at six months
b)
The presentation about the Phase 2 trials of the investigational CFTR corrector
VX-809 (lumacaftor) administered in combination with ivacaftor (better known as
Kalydeco) for patients with the genetic mutation F508del. Several different
doses were used and the data showed that 600mg of VX-809 in conjunction with
250 mg of ivacaftor gave the best response in patients with two copies of
F508del, showing a significant improvement in FEV1. The next step
for this was to move to Phase 3 studies – a really exciting proposal for the
future for patients with F508del gene mutations.
This
brought me to lunchtime where I had a chance to visit the poster presentations
in the exhibit hall. I looked out the posters with reference to the Registry
including looking at some work on renal clearance from the Nottingham group
using Registry data and gender differences in the UK from the Brompton group using
Registry data. It is always exciting to see the UK CF Registry being
referenced.
The
afternoon took me to a symposium on updates to infection control guidelines and
then onto the first plenary session where the 3000+ delegates all sat engrossed
in the topic of reversing the basic defect – a vision for the future (I will
leave this bit of the blog to Dr Janet Allen,
our Director of Research!).
Finally
at 6pm the welcome reception provided a chance for networking and renewal of
acquaintances from previous conferences, and discussion around the common
themes of our work.
And so to bed with the alarm set for 0600 for
day 3!